If you were hoping for a rational debate about homosexual marriage when the High Court sits next month, then you are going to be sorely disappointed. That’s because the rainbow wig-wearers will be arguing for the ACT’s new-fangled marriage equality laws by stating that homosexual marriage is not marriage at all. It’s a bizarre position that could only be held by radicals, who see marriage as a means, rather than an end.
If the ACT’s lawyers win and the capital gets to keep homosexual marriage, it will only be because the highest court in the land is satisfied that gay unions are not anything like marriages. Hey, that’s what any logical person has been shouting for free from the tree-tops for some time now. Unfortunately, this will not stop the pro-gay marriage QCs from racking up the charges to the ACT taxpayer just for taking this common-sense point to the High Court.
The great absurdity of the pro-homosexual marriage crowd’s position is embedded deep within the fine print of the ACT’s big new gay law. And soon it will be unearthed and raised up in bright, blinking, glitter-encrusted neon lights for all to see at the High Court.
At least the ACT legislature has admitted something that anyone with even a mediocre ability to reason should be able to understand: homosexual liaisons are not the same as marriage. And even if you call them ‘marriage’, they are still not the real thing. In fact, just like cheap, plastic imitations of fine art, pushed out from Chinese sweatshops, the ACT’s homosexual marriage laws only serve to highlight how tacky fakes can never reach the perfection, nobility or beauty of a real marriage.
There is an immeasurable gulf between phoney ‘gay marriage’, celebrated at the Mardi Gras as nothing more than a perverted, lusting promotion of sodomy, and the authentic article.
When a government plans to send out certificates for such a ‘marriage’, then it becomes public business. And those who cherish marriage are not only entitled to a say, but obligated to fight against this perverse attack on it.
Real marriage involves sexual activity that is complementary and leads to life and the nurturing of it through the generations. But a real wife is not a mere prostitute. And a real husband is not in it just for the sex. The events of marriage turn husbands and wives into so much more: mothers and fathers.
And only within a real marriage, where a husband and wife have pledged to love each other to the exclusion of all others until the dark adventure of death takes one of the team, can children be raised in the most ideal of circumstances. Any other family type is less than ideal. Period.
But ‘gay marriages’ can’t create children. It’s only and entirely about normalising and glorifying the gay sex – sodomy. Nothing more, nothing less.
There is no next part. Unlike the selfless love of a real marriage, the activity of gay marriage has only one end: carnal selfishness. Then there is a big dead end.
Homosexual activity is empty. It cannot bring children. And when children are entrusted to a homosexual couple, it is always to their deliberate detriment: a former family torn apart; or a child intentionally created to be deliberately separated from its real parents. Surrogacy is premeditated malice against the most innocent.
Furthermore, homosexual marriage is also the most inherently sexist notion on earth. It attacks the very reason for the sexes. Males and females exist for a reason – even the godless, Darwinian evolutionist recognises this. But in the perversion of ‘gay marriage’ the complementary union of the sexes is thrown away. In the one thing where it is more important than any other that the two sexes are present, homosexuals want to remove the feminine side of humanity altogether. And lesbians think that they can offer masculinity. They cannot.
Homosexual marriage is so ridiculous an idea that it could only be possibly entertained in a society that has truly lost its way, its nobility and values, and the very ability to reason.