People die when you appease the enemy (or George Brandis should go)

The President of France has said this is war.

Prime Minister Turnbull stated that it looks like war.

Even Australia’s security agencies are talking openly about an insurgency for the first time. Maybe they have been reading my articles.

Yet for all the words, there is no action.

And there is no action because the words being flung around are meaningless.

There is no point declaring war if you still won’t name the enemy.

There is no point claiming that an insurgency is underway in Australia if anti-discrimination laws and official government diversity programs are actually funding, aiding and abetting the enemy.

There is no clearer sign that our government is as useless as a peace sign in Raqqa when it comes to fighting Islamic terrorism than the words today uttered by our Attorney General, George Brandis.

After the Paris terrorist attacks, George Brandis claims that the worst possible thing we can do is alienate the Islamic community. This is what he said:

“The worst thing we could do is to alienate the Muslim community; they are our fellow citizens and they are our necessary partners in combating this menace.”

That’s not the way I see it.

The worst possible thing Australia can do after Paris is ignore the facts, ignore the reality and ignore the danger. Ongoing wilful and deliberate ignorance is the worst thing we can do because it will lead to the same result as Paris: dead people in the streets.

This whole focus on reassuring the Islamic community that we are on the same side has now become a deadly farce.

We are not on the same side and it’s not because I say it. It’s because the Islamic community says it.

The Grand Mufti says it. He is the one that is proud to go on the public record and even write to the Senate to explain that laws outlawing the advocation of terrorism infringe his community’s religious freedom.

Thanks to the Grand Mufti, there is no excuse for us not to know that advocation of terrorism is part and parcel of the Islamic religion.

The Grand Mufti has also gone out of his way to publicly defend Hizb ut Tahrir – the organisation that has openly and vehemently rejected our values, our laws, our heritage, our anthem and that has even called for an Islamic army to impose Sharia law in Australia.

Hizb ut Tahrir is the political face of an Islamic insurgency intent on destroying Australia’s democratic society.

Yet this is where the Grand Mufti’s allegiance lies.

That is why after the Paris terrorist attack the Grand Mufti issued a press release. And instead of condemning terrorism, the Grand Mufti has laid the blame at our feet, even criticising ‘military intervention’. If we listen to the Grand Mufti, we’ll bring the boys back home now from the war against the Islamic State.

10153693_778236335619441_5417964083589491238_n

The Grand Mufti does not want to stand against terrorism. After Paris, he wants us to stand against the ‘injustice’ of Islamophobia, which he dares to term a ‘causative factor’ of the terrorist attack in Paris. As always, the Islamic community blames us for the violence wrought by those who cry Allahu Akbar.

When people are dying in the streets as a result of Islam, one can be forgiven for being a little apprehensive about this religion. Islamophobia is the perfectly logical response to Islam: after all, Islam kills.

It’s that simple.

The Grand Mufti, Islamic organisations and the Islamic community in general have made it very clear over and over again: they are deliberately alienated from Australian society and they have no intention of changing anything, other than our laws and culture so that they are subject to Islam.

As such, George Brandis’ words are disgraceful and he should go. He’s not interested in saving the lives of Australians. He’s interested in protecting a community that has more of its sons fighting for the Islamic State than the Australian Defence Force.

As the Australian Liberty Alliance Senate candidate for Queensland, I am proud to give this guarantee: I will not appease Islam to win brownie-points with the progressive left. I recognise that Islam is the cause of the threat we are facing and if I am elected, I will take action to address that threat and protect all Australians.

Facebook - Meetings2

Further details of upcoming Australian Liberty Alliance meetings in Queensland can be found here. Venues will be finalised shortly based on attendance numbers. Venue details will be emailed to all who register once they are confirmed.

Author: Bernard Gaynor

Bernard Gaynor is a married father of eight children. He has a background in military intelligence, Arabic language and culture and is an outspoken advocate of conservative and family values.

Share This Post On

14 Comments

  1. https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters/issue-84/legal-recognition-sharia-law

    This is our Government. Instead of making it clear that there is and can only be one law under the constitution, political nonsense like this is peddled as “research” by the AIFS.
    The only concern that Government research bodies should report is that Muslims believe that they can have laws passed outside of the parliament and contrary to our Constitution and even the Magna Carta.
    The new word “Pluralism” achieves new low from “multiculturalism” and the ideal of equal rights under the constitution. Under Multiculturalism different cultures could establish themselves here and rather than attempt to integrate, are free to set up separate communities and demand social services including free interpreting services, TV and radio in their local language on top of unemployment benefits and their own specialist suppliers. Under “Pluralism” these communities will be free to become no-go zones living under a separate legal system.
    Any attempt at promoting theocracies must be condemned by all political parties as a plunge back to the dark ages. I note that Australia is a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human rights which simultaneously and necessarily, excludes Sharia law.

    Post a Reply
  2. “The outstanding feature of the opening phase of the Middle East (WWII) was the unreadiness of both sides to undertake operations. This dangerous state of affairs had been forced on the British Service authorities by Government policy, which resulted in the first instance from general public apathy towards defence, and secondly from the attempt to appease the imperialistically minded dictators by weakly acquiescing in the early acts of aggression. The lessons here are:

    (a) That once Service strengths have been allowed to run down they cannot be restored quickly.
    (b) That the restoration of Service strengths requires much more than giving them the necessary manpower; it requires an immense and sustained effort involving every aspect of national life.
    (c) That peace cannot be brought by appeasement; that it is far better in the long run to challenge at an early stage rather than allow an aggressor to go on from strength to strength until the inevitable war begins with the defender at a dangerous disadvantage.

    If you make the deductions from your intelligence reports fit your preconceived notions about what the enemy is or ought to be doing, you are almost bound to be surprised.”
    MIDDLE EAST 1939-43, DIRECTORATE OF MILITARY TRAINING, Military Board Army Headquarters, Melbourne, 31/8/1959

    ‘preconceived notions’=refugee adherents of a genocide construct crossing your borders first, second, third generations do not represent an increasing terror risk to Other cultures and will not inform burning buildings, broken bodies and lives this culture systematically informs, with bloodied bodies already in your own streets.

    I would like to get this hardcover insightful book wasted upon our current inept dangerous cultural gatekeepers who allow the enemy to flourish within our walls and inform terror-genocide increasingly in our streets as this enemy have done throughout history and continue to do elsewhere and………

    Post a Reply
    • Good on you. The ALA candidate in WA will have my family’s votes.

      Post a Reply
  3. Thanks for speaking up Bernard and for running for parliament. We need men and women of grit, conviction and character to lead this country. Not fawning appeasers with no vision beyond the end of their nose. Gutless, swindling, lying and morally bankrupt power merchants who arrogantly think they have the exclusive right to have genuine dialogue behind closed doors regarding these vital matters which go to the core of Australian security, values and our precious way of life. Islam is the sea in which the ISIL death cult and it’s sympathisers swim. If you think otherwise then it’s time to wake up and smell the semtex.

    Post a Reply
  4. 2 Chronicles 19:2

    And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to King Jehoshaphat, “Should you help the wicked and love those who hate the Lord? Therefore the wrath of the Lord is upon you.

    Post a Reply
  5. “That’s not the way I see it”. Your words. It is a pity the majority of Australians think like Brandis (most probably do not think about it at all, until now!)

    Now is the time for you to continue your push for more people to become educated. I am sending $100 today to help you fight the good fight.

    Post a Reply
  6. Bernard, unfortunately you are on the opposite of the country from us but we support your great efforts so far on all our Christian behalfs.
    Who is your/ALAs candidate in Western Australia ?

    Go Bernard; go ALA ,

    Post a Reply
  7. I imagine the Islamic community would feel isolated when they refuse to integrate with our society, respect our values or accept our culture. This is their problem, not ours, and we shouldn’t be labeled ‘Islamophobes’ for not wanting our society, values or culture to become like theirs.

    Post a Reply
    • While they might feel isolated they refuse to assimilate because their religion forbids it. Besides, they do not feel rejected in their isolation but rather feel special, as Allah’s chosen people.

      Post a Reply
      • Australia’s problem and therefore OUR problem is that these people have no intent to assimilate into our society, in fact they cannot assimilate because their religion does not allow it.
        Our Govt and the retrogressive Left talk about multi-culturism, cultural diversity and anything else except assimilation.
        They quote how the Europeans from many different countries and cultures have successfully introduced their cultures to Australia and Australians. The facts are, that those Europeans introduced their culture to us and at the same time accepted our culture. The cultures have stood side by side and even integrated over the years and both the Europeans and us Australians have benefitted greatly from it.
        This allowed the European migrants to ASSIMILATE into Australian society and we have all benefitted and all learned new ways and been happy.
        Muslims, and Arabs in general, will never integrate or assimilate. It is their way or no way. We are fools to allow our Govts to carry on as they have been and continuing to do so.

  8. Thankfully it seems we now have people who are willing to say what needs to be said.

    Post a Reply
  9. Bernard you are without a doubt an intelligent,unselfish,honest and above all courageous man, of strong principle and Christian values. I salute you. I fear for you. I will vote for you. I want you to represent me!

    Post a Reply
  10. Well articulated Bernard, it’s time to act. You have the safety and future of the whole country on your shoulders

    Post a Reply
    • The current Queensland premier is full of ignorance to the point of Dangerous.

      Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares