There’s nothing to see here…

I’m not surprised.

So I doubt you will be either.

Chief Inspector Nicole Bruce from the New South Wales ‘Professional Standards’ Unit and Richmond Area Command contacted me yesterday.

She rang to inform me that the New South Police would take no action against Gary Burns for this email:

Garry Burns' email confirming he accessed my address from the electoral roll and provided it to, or offered it to Islamic organisations.

Gary Burns’ email confirming he accessed my address from the electoral roll and then offered it to Islamic organisations.

Or this one:

Burns email 1

Gary Burns’ email threatening me with assault. It also contained a link to a post on his website with the same threat.

Or for any of the hundreds of other abusive emails I have received from him about such things as my children’s sexual preferences or how he thinks I deserve to be raped in jail.

As you may know, my family moved our home due to safety concerns after Gary Burns thought it would be a laugh to contact Islamic organisations and offer them my personal details. Hence my complaint to the police that Gary Burns was using a carriage service to harass, menace or cause offence.

Previously in this saga, the Queensland Police took no action because Burns lives in New South Wales and the New South Wales Police took no action because I live in Queensland. Hilariously, the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Board (ADB) did take action. Against me.

It believes it has universal jurisdiction to silence all dissent to homosexual activism and was upset that I didn’t appreciate Burns’ emails.

However, the law in question here is a Commonwealth law. There is no jurisdictional issue and I was relieved yesterday that I did not hear the word ‘jurisdiction’ once.

Nope. There is a whole new excuse as to why the New South Wales Police won’t touch Burns’ emails. Nicole told me that no action would be taken this time around because Burns has claimed that his email was hacked.

As a story it sounds exciting. But it’s actually full of holes.

Have a good look again at the second email above. And then look at this screenshot of Gary Burns’ old website:

Burns webpage 1

The article and the email, strangely, have identical titles and subjects. So either Burns’ website was hacked as well, or the mysterious ‘hacker’ decided to break his way into Burns’ computer for the purpose of emailing me a link to Burns’ article, or Burns’ email was not hacked at all.

Given Burns left the post up on his old website for months, I would be betting on the latter option. Especially so, given the same words also went up on his Facebook page:

Burns Facebook 1


Suffice to say, I was rather irate when told by the good Chief Inspector that the case was closed due to the information police had received about the ‘hacking’. And the phone call ended shortly thereafter.

Then I quietly pondered the implications of what I had been told. I found them rather disturbing.

Let’s examine what this really means.

The New South Wales Police believed that there is some truth to the story that a cyber-criminal mastermind weaselled his way into the email account of one of the most prominent homosexual activists in New South Wales and started flinging outrageous messages to Islamic organisations that also contain very personal information.

If this ‘hacking’ claim has any skerrick of truth then Gary Burns’ life is in danger. Mix hackers, Islam and homosexual activists and you’re setting up an ‘Allahu akbar’ moment.

Yet there will be no police investigation of this at all, let alone any further investigation as to how my personal details came to be involved. And I am supposed to be entirely content with this situation.

However, I am not. That is why I called Chief Inspector Nicole Bruce back to ask why there would be no investigation of this serious problem.

It was then, I think, that we came closer to the truth.

Nicole also explained that nothing further would occur as the emails were considered to be ‘free speech’ in the context of my ‘relationship’ with anti-free speech activist Gary Burns and that a normal person would not consider them to be harassing, menacing or even offensive.

So I would like to put on the public record exactly what my ‘relationship’ with Gary Burns entails.

I write about attacks on the normal family unit. Then Gary Burns lodges complaints about me with the ADB because he claims there is no such thing as free speech. He also then bombards me with abusive emails because, like, free speech. I then have the pleasure of moving for my safety and spending hundreds of thousands of dollars defending myself in the courts, lest I be forced into a position of choosing between being ordered to apologise to Burns by magistrates who also like to chat with him privately or be jailed for contempt (I’d choose the latter by the way).

And, as the icing on the cake of this ‘relationship’, when I publish Gary Burns’ emails (the same ones that New South Wales Police have now informed me he claims were hacked), he lodges complaints with the ADB that I have ‘victimised’ him for making fun of his emails. Strangely enough, in all the documentation sent to the ADB, Burns has never once claimed that his email has been hacked.

As you can see, this kind of ‘relationship’ is not conducive for the exchange of Christmas cards.

By way of background, it should be noted that Chief Inspector Nicole Bruce is also a GLLO – that stands for Gay and Lesbian Liaison Officer. She didn’t seem to think that this detail was relevant. I beg to differ. But I am probably just biased and homophobic.

No doubt, as a Gay and Lesbian Liaison Officer, Nicole Bruce is extraordinarily well placed to determine that a gay activist’s emails threatening me with assault on the basis of my Catholic faith and causing significant safety concerns for my family are not harassing or menacing.

But, if this is going to be the way things are, I do have a suggestion for the New South Wales Police: amend your webpage on bias crimes. The way it’s written, people like me are liable to gain an impression that everyone is to be protected from bias crimes that target people as a result of things such as their religious beliefs.

That’s obviously not the case when it comes to Catholics.


I don’t want you to get the impression that the various police forces in this nation don’t take the offence of using a carriage service to harass or menace seriously.

Just last week an Adelaide-supporting Aboriginal woman was charged with this offence for writing on Facebook that Port Adelaide star, Eddie Betts, should ‘go back to the zoo’.

And recently an Ipswich woman in Queensland was charged for the statements below to an Islamic activist who objected to supermarkets selling T-Shirts with the Australian flag and the words, ‘Love it or Leave’:


She was convicted and sentenced to 180 hours of community service.

I don’t condone this behaviour. It certainly does not help us to win the arguments that we need to win. But I would like some consistency. This is just another of the emails sent to me by Gary Burns:

Burns email 2

It is obviously nothing like the words sent to the Islamic activist…

…oh yeah, Burns is also having people charged with this offence too – probably after a Gay and Lesbian Liaison Officer made an assessment about what an average person might find offensive.

This is from Burns’ website in March this year:

Burns SunolHypocrisy anyone?

Author: Bernard Gaynor

Bernard Gaynor is a married father of nine children. He has a background in military intelligence, Arabic language and culture and is an outspoken advocate of conservative and family values.

Share This Post On


  1. What Mr Gaynor writes in this post is only the *tip of the iceberg* from my perspective, born of direct experience, for better or worse. Read on.

    Due to my *crime of association* with one of Gary Burns’ most hated and feared enemies, I have been dragged into this virulent and harmful cultural war. It is a war not of my choosing, but it is thrust upon me. Let me assure you, dear reader, that it is not a pleasant experience. This is a real war, with much at stake, and it is headed all the way to the High Court of Australia thanks to a valliant Christian soldiers like family-man Bernard Gaynor and grandmother Tess Corbett.

    This war has dragged my hitherto unaffected consciousness into a very sordid and sick world of political correctness, gender-bending and marriage-mangling. My heart goes out to Bernard and his family, having to deal with all this shite. This person Gary Burns has caused me much grief with his menacing and harrassing emails, sent to all my family members at various times. But I have to admit that the root cause of my problems must be my son, because if he were different, I would not be dragged in this conflict and my retirement would be much more peaceful.

    But wait. Before you jump to conclusions consider this: *problem definition* is everything when faced with a quandary or dilemma that needs to be solved and demands action. This means identifying what this problem is, and what it is not. Then you need to attribute a cause that fully explains the defined problem. I have been trained as an engineer to solve technical problems using these sort of rational problem-solving techniques. This is done to avoid wasting a lot of your client’s money on an assumed technical fix, that proves not to work, not to solve the problem.

    But from what I have learned late in life, political and institutional problems are a much more difficult chessnut to crack, a much more difficult problem to define, let alone solve.

    As I perceive it, it is the gay activists on the staff of the New South Wales Anti Discrimination Board, and their hierachy, who give this pest Gary Burns his oxygen. Further, it appears to me that it is the New South Wales Gay & Lesbian Liason Officers (GLLOs), and their heirachy, who give him his police protection. You see, he appears to be a valued asset of both institutions. He trolls the intertnet to feed his minders up the food chain with what they need, which is complaints in a complaint-driven judicial regime. And to the GLLOs he is, well, as it seems to me, not much more than your compromised, petty-criminal type “police informer” that I imagine is often stereotyped on TV crime entertainment shows.

    Without homosexual activism being institutionalised in New South Wales, this person Gary Burns would be just another lonely and lost person on a disability support pension, dealing with his psycnhiatric issues, and hopefully trying to find meaningful work that brings a little dignity and self-respect. But with his being used by these institutions as a patsy for social engineering and judicial activism, he has transformed himself into a highly successful “Anti Discrimination Campaigner”. He gets a lot of media spotlight and he wears smart suits when attending, on a virtually full-time basis, public hearings into “homosexual vilification” conducted by the New South Wales Civil & Administrative Tribuanl (NCAT), Equal Opportunity Division. This huge governmental justice bureaucracy is presumably influenced by Her Honour Magistrate Nancy Hennessy, the Deputy President, a natty dresser and a smart woman about whom Bernard has written on his blog. The irony is that Gary Burns appears in the victim role in these numerous publc hearings, not as the perpetrator of vexatious serial litigation. It is an upside-down world, in those NCAT homosexual vilification hearings.

    Here is the latest video interview with the person with whom I associate, because I have no choice – I am his father. I will not tell his story for him – he is quite capable of doing that himself. His photographic, highly associative memory is what makes him dangerous – and this might be due to his diagnosed Asperger’s Syndrome that caused so much havoc when he was at school, before he had to discontinue at aged 15. His first arrest warrant from the New South Wales Gay & Lesbian Liason Officers was after he left an impolite voice message on Gary Burns’ telephone answering machine on February 12, 2011, after he was first stalked and hunted down by Burns for his “homophobic” views spread around the internet. And the charges underlying the arrest warrant? “Use carriage service to menace, harass and offend”.

    Note the interviewer here seems an interesting character. A retired American professor of philossphy who has published many books on the subject of epistemology, or the theory of knowledge. Yet even this hardened interviewer is flabbergasted at what is going on in Australia. “Homosexual vilification” is now being joined with “religious vilification of a satanic bisexual cult” or so it seems. An upside-down world indeed!

    Post a Reply
  2. When hitler rose to power they said it was because no good men stood up!

    Thank God, We have Bernard

    Post a Reply
  3. Sometimes I wonder about who and how many have infiltrated our Govts, judicial system, public services and media. It is a worry.

    Post a Reply
  4. I feel like Australia has become like the old socialist East Germany behind the Berlin Wall.

    Post a Reply
  5. Disgusting people. Disgusting laws.

    Burns sounds like he has turned professional victim-hood into a profession & refined it into a master class of bullying. The potential problem for bullies is that when they think they can act with impunity only to one day pick on someone they didn’t suspect would be equally vile.

    Post a Reply
    • Angry Viking: you’re very perceptive and correct. From my experience (see my other posts on this thread) what goes against the interests of this damaged personality Gary Burns is for his taunts and insults to be ignored. His “work” is to manufacture homosexual vilification complaints for “the Board”. This is akin to the behaviour of a compromised but protected informer delivering to Stasi, thereby persecuting his fellow citizens in exchange for financial plus intangible rewards

      Post a Reply
  6. This is deeply disturbing … if those who should be upholding the law of the land are compromised in this way, how can we have any faith in encouraging young people (or anyone else for that matter) in seeking support for issues of bullying/harassment etc.

    Post a Reply
  7. Oxford University has cucked to the racism grievance industry.

    Students are being told to report ‘micro-aggressions’ to university PC officers.

    Native ethnic Britons who fail to make eye-contact with non-whites are deemed racist and guilty of ‘micro-aggression’.

    This Marxist social engineering is being imposed on the native population by a hostile political elite and its governing class.

    Post a Reply
  8. The Political Correctness Industry, now embedded across the Australian social spectrum, does not even rise to the level of hypocrisy.

    They just use their PCspeak to impose their agenda.

    There are many Australians who have no rights against the PC menace. Period. The mere fact of their existence is an offense to some entitled activist group supported by their grievance industry.

    Here is the latest example of an Australian with no rights.

    An Australian (Mike) who feared to give his name (for speaking out) told the Daily Telegraph that “four men of ‘middle eastern’ appearance ripped his cross off his neck, stomped on it and then punched his back, neck and shoulders. Two women attacked his girlfriend when she tried to intervene. Five uniformed transport officers watched what happened but did nothing to stop it, Mike said.”

    Post a Reply
  9. What a waste of tax dollars our Police farce is. Anything but real police work!

    Post a Reply
  10. Speechless……gobsmacked. What unbelievable hypocrisy.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pin It on Pinterest