‘Marriage equality’ heads down Sharia Law Highway

What a pickle we’re in.

The push for homosexual marriage will necessarily hit freedom of political communication and religion very hard.

The only way to address this is to implement laws protecting religious freedom.

And the consequence of that will be legal recognition and protection of Sharia law:

Australians are being warned that a rush to legislate religious freedom could open the door to sharia law, as senior conservatives call for “cooler heads to prevail” in the growing dispute over the protections needed when parliament enacts marriage equality.

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton and Defence Personnel Minister Dan Tehan are urging colleagues to avoid sweeping amendments with unintended consequences, such as creating religious enclaves shielded by law.

It kind of brings back memories of this:

Voting yes for homosexual marriage will be voting yes to opening the door to ‘marriage equality’ for the Islamic community as well.

I wrote that back in August.

And memories of this:

Proposed changes to marriage laws will lead to the inadvertent recognition of Sharia law marriage, polygamy and divorce in Australia.

Any changes to marriage laws to please one minority group will result in calls for other minority groups to also have their views on marriage enshrined in law as well. Furthermore, proposals have already been put forward to recognise all religious marriages in order to ensure that any changes to marriage laws do not limit freedom of religion or political communication.

I wrote that back in May 2016.

And memories of this:

It might seem like an absurd situation. In fact, it is an absurd situation. But the truth is that Islam and the LGBT crowd sleep together. They are strange bedfellows, sleeping beneath a bed head emblazoned with the words “Destroy Christianity”.

On one side you have the LGBT movement: morally-bankrupt, thoroughly-corrupted and vacuous. It cannot logically articulate why anything is wrong, precisely because it does not believe in any form of objective truth or morality at all.

As such, homosexuals generally have no hesitation in joining forces with those who would stone them to death, simply because it is convenient for the moment.

And on the other side you have Islam: a deceitful religious ideology that was founded by a man who knew the importance of playing nice with his enemies until he had amassed enough power to force them into total submission.

As such, Islam is quite prepared to make an alliance with useful idiots in order to secure a bigger victory.

I wrote that way back in July 2014.

Along the way I have been ridiculed. Often by sneering journalists on the ‘Left’. That was expected.

However, it was frustrating to be told by Australians who are concerned about Islam that my concerns about homosexual marriage were a distraction in this fight.

But I was right. Australia’s national newspaper is all of a sudden linking ‘marriage equality’ with Sharia law.

Small comfort. I’d rather be wrong if it meant that we were not now confronting this nightmare scenario.

Legalising homosexual marriage without religious freedom protections will result in a state-sanctioned Christian persecution.

Legalising it while implementing religious freedom protections will necessarily entail giving legal rights and recognition to Sharia law. That will also end up leading to state-sanctioned Christian persecution too.

Of course, the simple solution to this problem is not to legalise homosexual marriage.

Failing that, it would be to recognise that Australia is built on Western Christian values and offer legal protections only to those who defend them.

And that will never happen.

Indeed, Bill Shorten and Malcolm Turnbull, both avid defenders of religious freedom while votes were still being cast are now arguing that the problem should not even be dealt with during the rush to parliament’s rainbow altar.

They tell us parliament will look at it next year.

That’s code for they have no intention of debating laws to protect Christians at all.

In any event, the ‘exceptions’ that may be passed are not there for the long haul. It only takes a Labor government and they’ll be repealed, never to be heard of again.

In the meantime, Christians will face lawfare while Islamic enclaves will not.

Practically, Islam will be protected. Islamic enclaves are just that. There’s not much call for gay wedding cakes in those areas. And the homosexual activists, so keen to try on their tricks against Christian grandmothers are not so keen to do the same with Muslims.

They’re cowards and the Islamic world knows it.

It’s one thing to lodge a complaint against a law-abiding Christian charity. It’s another thing entirely to ask Halal Certified Baklava Brothers to make you a rainbow cake. An explosive one might just turn up on your doorstep.

To make matters worse, you can bet your bottom dollar that the anti-discrimination crowd will come up with a solution that will only exacerbate problems: look out for ‘religious freedom’ laws that only protect ‘ethno-religious’ communities.

That way Muslims will be protected legally. And Christians won’t.

That’s the way the elite want it. That’s where it is headed. Australia voted for this. And as I said last week, as a nation it will get everything it deserves…

Author: Bernard Gaynor

Bernard Gaynor is a married father of nine children. He has a background in military intelligence, Arabic language and culture and is an outspoken advocate of conservative and family values.

Share This Post On


  1. When gays are inevitably attacked and killed with respect to Sharia in Australia, who might they turn to for protection? Talk about biting the hand that feeds (or protects in this case). I’m tired – let them fend for themselves since they have little respect for anyone else, none for children or for those (mostly Christian) who fought and died for their current freedoms. We are governed by traitors and narcissistic sociopaths. Rights for them but not for you. History repeats itself.

    This is one of those ‘be careful what you wish for’ moments for the gay community. The nihilistic 1%.

    Good job thus far, Bernard. Contrary to media reports, this was an unprotected survey conducted by Australia Post and the ABS not a formal, protected vote run by the AEC. It has little legitimacy but does demonstrate the moribund state of our polity and society.

    A note on Trump’s arms deal with Saudi Arabia- Let’s hope our forces are kept out of the mid-east in any alliance obligation with the US. Take a look online at Jake Morphonios videos. Most informative.

    Best wishes for the Christmas period and beyond.

    Post a Reply
    • Yes Merry Christmas to all as well, [not happy holiday], before we are ‘legally’ not allowed to say that because it may upset some section of the community.
      It will come to this once great Nation.

      Post a Reply
  2. The average idiot who voted yes, that’s the average Joe etc , had for years been saying “they (Gays) can get married , as long as they can’ t adopt kids”.It was these idiots along with brainwashed millennials that allowed the yes vote to go through . The average Joe thought they could have their cake and eat it! Instead they’ve opened the floodgates.

    Post a Reply
  3. Remember the SSM legislation people enthusiastically voted for, has in one week, been transformed by the Smith-legislation into 2-person marriage. ‘Same-sex’ is both limiting and discriminatory for the rest of the gender-alphabet – so as of today SSM is history.

    Now it is a very small step to replace the ‘2’ with say ‘4’ and bingo, Sharia-marriage.

    Post a Reply
  4. A religious freedom law for ethnic minorities would work to protect Islam from the Gender Offensive and not (what is at this time) Australia’s largest ethnic demographic, which is, for the most part, secular.

    The old founding European stock and heritage population of Australia is European, specifically Anglo-Celtic. Yet this is the one ethnicity that is not permitted to see itself as an ethnicity – probably because of its secular character.

    They will not like Islam for the same reason they do not like C of E, or the pope or church-ey types or do gooders and god-botherers. The fact that the social welfare infrastructure of Australia grew out of the Christian churches serving a Christian population (the social capital)is not something they tend to recognise. It is something they have secularised. But when it goes – we won’t be getting it back.

    As far as I know, Spain alone fought and won a war of Reconquista on its own land against Islam. And they had a lot more going for them than secularism and gay pride.

    In terms of Identity politics, the ethnic identity of what was up until 40 years ago or even 30 years ago the White Australia of the long standing White Australia Policy is: Anglo Celtic and European. Its religion, even its nominal religion is: Christianity.

    All institutions founded on the Australian state grow out of this: law, government, economy, education, art, way of life and is permeated by norms and principles of Christianity.

    For almost half a century, the founding people of the Australian state have not been permitted by Our Betters to think in these terms. But every other ethnic group in Australia sees us in the ethnic terms just stated. They either assimilate to it and enjoy their own compatible ethnic community life or they don’t.

    Islam does not. And it will claim hegemon on the Australian continent because demographics is destiny.

    The fight will come to the White Anglo Celtics and Europeans through both the Gender Offensive and Islam – whether they are secular or not.

    Working together these shears will cut the social fabric to order and that order will be Dar al-Islam.

    Post a Reply
  5. Marriage and children of the marriage (yes, of course there have always been variations) is the foundation of the natural and social order. Depart from this foundation and you do not have a primary social order that can create and sustain other communities, institutions and economies.

    Count on it. They won’t be teaching this fundamental in Australian gender studies anytime soon.

    In Dar al-Harb (house of conflict eg a non-Muslim society) the Revolutionary path of the gender offensive against Australian society and Hijrah (jihad against Dar al-Harb: Australia by immigration) was always going to merge. Is not relevant that Qu’ran condemns homosexuality. That is for Dar al-Islam (when society has become Muslim)

    In Dar al-Harb, the religion of peace and the Gender Offensive against Australian society will work together just fine. Think: kismet.

    Post a Reply
  6. Well said, Bernard. We will reap what oir mation is so gleefully sowing.

    Post a Reply
  7. Oh we are a slow lot!!
    Thank you for doing your best in the face of stupidity!!

    Post a Reply
    • Well i voted NO…So why should we all be crucified..We need to make Islam a idealogy..It is not a religion..

      Post a Reply
    • Wow thankyou for this excellent article. I am saving and sharing it. A lot!
      Thankyou for loving this country Bernard.

      Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pin It on Pinterest